When will the few genuine Datuks defend their dignity, protect the sanctity of the “Datuk” award and fight off the “Latuks” of society?
The “Cash-for-Datuks“ fiasco has been brewing for decades, but we regularly read about Datuks, misbehaving in public and committing crime.
The most recent was yesterday, when a 36-year-old actor who had gone to the Kota Damansara police station to lodge a police report about a road accident, then lost his temper, at the traffic counter of the police station, allegedly kicked a civilian and then slapped a policeman. Police chief ACP, Mohd Zani Che Din, confirmed that the man was then arrested, and later tested positive for ganja.
The actor had recently been awarded a datukship. The state which awarded him the Datukship was Pahang.
Remember Datuk Ong aka Datuk M, who was the leader of Gang 24
In December 2016, the shooting of a Datuk in Penang, propelled the debate about “Cash for Datuks” into overdrive, on social media.
A businessman, Ong Teik Kwong, was shot dead, in his car, near the Penang bridge. His alleged murderer, who was seated in the passenger seat, had drawn a revolver and shot Ong in the neck.
The police confirmed that Ong was the head of “Gang 24” and had been under police surveillance. “Gang 24”, and 13 other secret societies, ran protection rackets.
On being conferred his Datukship, Ong’s peers paid RM150,000 for 50 full page adverts, in the local Chinese paper, to congratulate him.
Is there a vetting system?
Whilst it is not shocking to discover that Ong’s Datukship was from Pahang, it is sad that the vetting system, for these awards, had failed.
Should the Sultan’s advisers be sacked for shoddy preparatory work? Is the Sultan not privy to what goes on in the royal household? The age of the recipient is a dead give-away.
Thugs like Ong sully the few genuine Datuks, tarnish the songkok which they wear for the investiture ceremony and render meaningless the award system. In other words, having criminals as Datuks, cheapens the award.
Worse still, police checks on the criminal records of nominees for the Datukship, had also failed. What sort of message is being passed to the rakyat, when a known criminal prides himself on being called a Datuk?
Were the character checks conducted by the police, less than thorough? Was Ong vetted? Indeed, are any of the “Datuks-duit” vetted?
The underlying suggestion is that crime does pay, because Ong’s notorious past was no secret.
The message about criminal datuks is that crime does pay
Ordinary Malaysians try to be model citizens. When they read reports of Ong’s death, in the local dailies, they become enraged, because of his award and the fact that the police knew about his brutal and murderous past.
The alleged murderer, having shot Ong, took aim at a person in the back seat of the car, but despite being shot, this man escaped, and fled. Two innocent bystanders were also killed, whilst two more were injured by a volley of stray bullets.
Initially, some people felt sorrow for Ong, who had died a brutal death. He was only 32.
Their sadness was replaced with rage, on discovering that the alleged murderer was the businessman’s own bodyguard.
A young man, who needs an armed bodyguard, cannot be of unblemished character.
Does a code of conduct exist, for datuks?
Ong had prided himself at being called “Datuk M” or “Datuk Muda”, because he was one of the youngest men, to have become a Datuk.
Gone are the days, when the nominee for a Datukship, had to be an upright citizen, without so much as a parking ticket issued to him.
The nominee would have dedicated his whole life to public service, like retired judges or ageing civil servants. Perhaps, in the private sector, the nominee’s life’s work, might have been to help less fortunate Malaysians.
If the police and the royal households want to continue to be respected, they must pull their fingers out, and do something to clean up their acts. Tensions are simmering, and the rakyat is beginning to think that crime does pay.
The youth are unhappy, whilst the old hark back to yesteryear, when money did not corrupt morals. Today’s irresponsible leaders do not care for the environment. They rape the countryside of its riches, to fuel their greed.
Nothing fills the rakyat with more contempt, than knowing that a Datuk who lived amongst them, is a criminal gang leader, an alleged murderer and someone who had been under police surveillance.
Should Datukships be scrapped?
It is alleged that a sycophantic junior MAS employee, who also runs his own cargo firm, at London’s Heathrow Airport, was conferred a Datukship, because he is skilled at paying homage to one particular VVIP, who often flies from Heathrow. The Latuk turns up, to service the VVIP, even when he is off-duty, or on holiday.
A Datuk who has a whiff of scandal about him, should be stripped of his title. A complete list of newly-minted Datuks, from each state, should be made available on the net. Their ages should also be listed, and their good deeds recorded.
On the other hand, it is time the Datukships are scrapped. The abuse of power, makes a mockery of the honorific. The rakyat are not blind.
[amazon_link asins=’B076RQZD4Z’ template=’ProductCarousel’ store=’mariammokhtar-21′ marketplace=’UK’ link_id=’39415640-f7af-11e7-90ea-89d236139fc9′]